Do You Really Need a Home Energy Monitor? – The New York Times

Whole-home energy monitors can potentially measure how much electricity your home uses down to the individual circuits and even single devices, thus allowing you to identify ways to save. With electricity rates rising nationwide and climate change driving conversations about consumption, efficiency, and how people get their energy, these monitors have appeal. According to the manufacturers and some of the independent experts we spoke with, many households save an average of nearly 10% on their power bills in the year after installing a monitor, with more engaged people saving up to twice that.

So why, after planning to test these monitors and make a recommendation, did we come away questioning their overall value for our readers? It’s not because they don’t work—we identified three models that we’d suggest to anyone going forward with a purchase. It’s because they may not be necessary. That finding felt like the most urgent information for us to convey. Our conclusion became apparent as source after source outlined simple, tried-and-true steps anyone can take to lower electricity bills without the use of an energy monitor. It came into greater focus as sources emphasized how smart devices, often capable of reporting and limiting their own energy use, could integrate with Amazon Alexa, Apple HomeKit, or Google Home to form their own suite of information for both active and automated energy management. With smart tech integrating into more devices and even into circuit breaker panels, energy monitors may become a thing of the past. Here, we aim to help you determine whether a monitor or other energy-saving technology is your better choice today.

Sense Energy Monitor

Sense, one of the earliest monitors available, uses machine learning to identify individual appliances and their electricity usage.

Sense’s monitors employ machine learning—and a million measurements per second—to try to identify individual appliances and their power draw, teasing out their unique “signatures” from your home’s main power feeds. The version that we’d suggest anyone consider first is the company’s base model, but Sense also offers two upgrades, one that adds the ability to measure solar-panel output (if you have panels, of course) and another that can directly monitor two sub-circuits, “perfect for large loads, like HVAC systems and EV chargers or hard-to-detect variable motors, like heat pumps,” as the company’s marketing language says. The aim of the machine learning is simple: Although your utility company can tell you how much electricity you use each month, a monitor can give you more granular data on where your electricity is being used, potentially allowing you to identify areas where you can be more efficient (the data comes to you via smartphone and web apps). Sense told us that its customers realize an average savings of roughly 10% in the year after the monitor is installed, with active users often seeing 20%; these figures are in line with what we heard from the makers of other monitors we investigated. But machine learning is very difficult to implement well—which Sense was open about—and though most customers rate the company’s monitors highly, about 15% report that even after lengthy use, their monitor hasn’t been able to ID many devices.

Generac PWRview W2

Generac’s PWRview W2 monitor, based on the earlier Neurio W1, also uses …….

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/home-energy-monitor/

Tags:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *